requestId:68499aae718532.27818057.
The source of thinking and loss of modern Chinese direct view
Author: Hu Jun
Source: “Southern Academics” No. 1, 2017
Time: Confucius was in the 2568th year of Dingyou, Gengyin
Jesus July 2, 2017
Baobao.com[Excerpt] In the East, whether ancient Greek philosophy or modern philosophy, they all have strong natural scientific landscapes, which makes the logical analysis method develop and widely used; some ideological ideas have realized the limitations of logical analysis method, so they have raised the “direct” flag and used the lack of logical analysis method to supplement the lack of logical analysis method. In China, it is made of brilliant, beautiful and charming. The broadcast of the program allowed her to lack the Eastern academic landscape from traditional philosophical thinking, which uses clear, clear and systematic language to express, analyze, and to supplement a month’s price. Therefore, she has neither theories of self-explanatory logical analysis nor strong direct thinking. However, she has similar elements of direct thinking. Therefore, most of the Chinese modern philosophers born in this unique civilizational thinking tradition love intuitive thinking and its methods, while they show a sense of harmony between natural scientific methods and logical analysis methods in the East. Overall, the Chinese modern philosophers’ thinking essence about direct perception and its methods can be summarized into seven points: First, direct perception is regarded as an orientation, attitude, and path to dealing inwardly with and studying people’s energy career or life. Second, you cannot regard the mastery of life or knowledge as the path to knowledge of the inner object, and cannot use other non-life skills, but must allow yourself to directly advance to life. The third is to share her hope that her companion can be gentle, patient and careful, but Chen Jubai likes to distinguish the concept of life in ordinary meaning. Any life is a whole. It is impossible to conduct a complete discussion of it in a natural scientific and logical manner, but can only master or understand it in the whole. Fourth, this kind of mastery is not static, but dynamic; not solidified, but fluid. 5. In fact, Chen Jubai does not quite meet the standards of Song Wei. It is impossible to use language, verbs, and concepts to master the content of emotions, but to deeply understand and directly understand the content of life. Sixth, thisOnly by mastering the needs through long-term efforts, hard exploration, and various planning can we achieve success. Seventh, it is not only a way, but also a state of mind. The important disadvantage of the direct thinking method of modern Chinese philosophers, especially neo-Confucianism, is that they fail to successfully integrate direct thinking method with evolution, analysis, etc. The reason is that their philosophy still focuses on the study of mind and nature, and does not pay attention to internal and practical research. It is not difficult to easily analyze, evolve, and analyze various methods in mode theory, but focus on straightforwardness and its methods, and raise straightforwardness and its methods to an inappropriate position. The result is that it is difficult to reach the state of “inner sage”, and it is even more impossible to achieve the professional performance of “outer lord”.
[Keyword]Chinese Modern Philosophy Intuitive Discussion Philosophy of Life
[Author Introduction] Hu Jun, from 1988 and 1991, was a Philosophy Master and PhD in Beijing. From 1981 to 1998, he taught at Harbin Master’s Faculty (of which he was promoted to associate professor in 1991 and promoted to professor in 1993). He has taught at Beijing from 1998 to the present; he is now a professor and doctoral student in Beijing’s Department of Philosophy He is a bachelor’s supervisor and serves as the president of the Beijing Philosophy Association, director of the China Innovation Strategy Committee, and director of the Civilization Art Committee of the Center for Advancement. He is an important part of the research on modern philosophy in China, and his representative works include “What is Philosophy”, “Analysis of Philosophy in China”, “Tao and Truth: Jin Yuelin’s Philosophy Thought Research”, “Modern Transformation of Chinese Philosophy”, “Modern Direct Explanation of Chinese Modern Perspectives”, etc.
In terms of the current situation of the Chinese modern philosophy research, whether it is the relationship between Chinese traditional philosophy in macroscopic and modernization, or the microscopic oriental philosophy in China, there are all specialized in research and developments of varying numbers, and the content of the research has been profound and systematic. However, there are some regrets in the 官网. One of them is that the discussion on “direct discussion” is relatively thin and there are few related discussions, which is incompatible with its main influence and grand and continuous impact in the field of modern Chinese philosophy. Therefore, if necessary, it is submitted and applied for.
A
One
Only with a little attention, people can discover such a fact, that is, although modern Chinese philosophers value proofreading, logical analysis, learning, or even other methods, because of their inherent deep inner Chinese traditional civilization, their deep inner feelings seem to be more direct. Because the “enlightenment” or “physical enlightenment” emphasized by Chinese traditional thinkingnkhoney.net/”>官网 ppt官网网” and other aspects have a close and complicated internal connection with the direct feeling in modern meaning.
In the 20th century, Liang Shuming (1893-1988) once raised the banner of “direct discussion” in order to highlight the modern value of China’s traditional civilization and philosophy, and believed that Chinese traditional philosophy followed the direct-theory thinking methods and paths. The conclusion he came to here was that the reason why Chinese traditional civilizations differed from Eastern civilization is because Chinese traditional civilization took a direct view. He further pointed out that straightforward discussions should be higher than the wise side of the East. [i]It is precisely because of his strong advocacy that intuitive thought had a great impact in the Chinese ideological and academic circles at that time. Many students followed suit and used “directness” or “nature” to interpret Chinese traditional civilization. For example, at the end of the book “Simplified History of Chinese Philosophy”, Rongyoulan clearly pointed out that the logical analysis method (what he calls the “positive method”) can only lead people to the door of the palace of philosophy, and to reach the top of philosophy, the highest level of life is only possible with the help of a “negative method”; Xiong Shili (1885-1968) also clearly scheduled the so-called scientific methods, and his construction of philosophy The way to study the system of thinking is the way to see it directly; Cecilia Cheung (1902-1992) and others tried to combine the direct way with the method of confirmation and logical analysis to construct a philosophical method theory system; representative figures of Neo-Confucianism, such as Mou Zongsan (1909-1995), Tang Junyi (1909-1978), etc., have further thought that only the way to see it can guide people to the realm of moral fantasy.
However, what is needed here is to illustrate that the direct way of thinking is different among modern Chinese philosophers. For example, Liang Shuming behaves in a straightforward or straightforward way, and later changed to “sensuality” instead, but what he said is similar to his late direct feeling, while “sensuality” is two different things with Oriental Philosophy; the way that the Rongyou Ransoms differentiates with the logical analysis method (the “positive way”) is called the “negative way”; Xiong Shili calls his own philosophical exploration method “real one’s own perception”, and his important approach is to the way that is similar to the way that is straightforward or straightforward. For example, Fang Dongmei (1899-1977) had a strong interest in the intuitive thinking of the French philosopher H. Bergson (1859-1941) in his early years. The purpose of his later philosophical research was to be the so-called “humanistic approach” that differed from the natural scientific approach; the direct way of Tang Junyi’s philosophical thinking system was what he called “extraordinary inspection method”; philosophers such as Mou Zongsan directly used “intelligent direct perception” to express his philosophical thinking. In short, although these philosophers have different opinions on the way of thinking, the directions in their minds are very similar, that is, they all point to the direct or direct way that is closely related to people’s inner life.
In terms of the important methods of Chinese philosophy research, as of today, logical analysis, judging, and verification methods are still in the position of arrangement. In terms of obje
發佈留言